SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Pamela Houston

On record 4,504 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Pamela Houston's approval rates are measured against the broader context of the Orlando bench, where lifetime approval rates for judges range from 34% to 89%. In the most recent reporting period, her approval rate of 64% sits 4 points above the office average of 60%. These figures are derived from a sample of 4,504 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 58%
Decisions on record 4,504
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Houston Orlando National
Approval rate 64% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 55%
Denials 36%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Houston's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Houston
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your approval trend for Pamela Houston has shown notable shifts. After a period of lower approval rates between 2018 and 2019, the data indicates a consistent upward trajectory through 2024. Her recent performance remains strong, with the latest-period approval rate of 64% reflecting a continuation of this steady pattern. This trend suggests that recent case outcomes have been more favorable than her historical lifetime average, though your results depend heavily on the specific medical evidence you present.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Houston's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orlando hearing office

The Orlando hearing office serves you throughout central Florida. This office maintains a diverse bench of 17 judges on record, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 60%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the evaluation of your medical and vocational evidence. You can see the Orlando Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Orlando hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is effectively random. There are 17 judges on record at this office since 2016, 8 of whom reported in the latest SSA period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 34% to 89% over their respective careers. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions