SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. J. William Callahan

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Oak Park Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 6,175 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Callahan?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides a clearer picture of your local hearing environment. Judge Callahan maintains a lifetime approval rate of 63% based on 6,175 lifetime decisions. This figure sits higher than both the state average of 56% and the national average of 58%. These rates reflect historical data rather than a guarantee of your specific outcome.

Metric Judge Callahan Oak Park National
Approval rate 63% 67% 58%
Fully favorable 54%
Denials 37%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Callahan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Callahan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a three-year tenure, Judge Callahan has presided over 6,175 lifetime decisions. The yearly trend shows an approval rate of 62% in 2016, 69% in 2017, and 58% in 2018. This variance reflects shifts in case volume and complexity common in high-volume hearing offices.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Callahan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Callahan? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oak Park hearing office

The Oak Park Hearing Office serves a significant population of applicants across Illinois, managing a high volume of disability appeals. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 67%. You can expect a professional environment focused on the evaluation of your medical evidence. You can view the full ALJ roster on the Oak Park Hearing Office page.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Oak Park office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 50% to 80%. This diversity in decision-making highlights why understanding the history of your hearing office is useful. You can find more information on the Oak Park Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions