Timothy J. Christensen maintains a 69% lifetime approval rate across 22,502 decisions, which sits above the 58% national average. In the latest reporting period, you would find the judge approved 73% of cases, performing 2 points higher than the Oak Park Hearing Office average. While these statistics provide a helpful baseline, they represent past decisions rather than predictions for your specific hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Christensen maintains a lifetime approval rate of 69%, which stands higher than the current 58% national average and the 56% state average. In the most recent reporting period, his 73% approval rate outperformed the local Oak Park office average of 67% by 2 percentage points. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 22,502 lifetime decisions, providing a stable statistical baseline for your review.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Christensen's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over his 10 years on the bench, Judge Christensen has seen his approval rates fluctuate, moving from a low of 60% in 2018 to a peak of 78% in 2023. This trend indicates a period of rising approvals in the middle of his tenure, followed by a stabilization in recent years. The latest period's 73% approval rate suggests that his decision-making remains consistent with his long-term career average.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Christensen's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Christensen? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Oak Park hearing office
The Oak Park Hearing Office serves a large population across Illinois, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 67%. You can expect a professional environment focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Within the Oak Park Hearing Office, individual lifetime approval rates for the 6 judges on the bench range from 36% to 80%. Because of this variance, the judge you are assigned can play a role in your hearing process.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
