SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Melody Paige

Last decided Oak ParkJul 2026
Decisions 4,266since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same time period to ensure a fair assessment. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Melody Paige's 84% approval rate sits above the 66% office average, the 60% state average, and the 58% national average. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a clear view of recent activity.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Paige Oak Park National
Approval rate 84% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 75% — —
Denials 16% — —
Decisions 422 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 78%
Decisions on record 4,266

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Paige's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Paige
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Melody Paige has issued 4,266 decisions. The yearly approval rate has fluctuated, showing a generally steady pattern with recent activity trending upward. While the 84% approval rate over the most recent 12 months sits above the 78% record since 2016, the data reflects a consistent history of decision-making.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Paige's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oak Park hearing office

The Oak Park Hearing Office serves you in Michigan and the surrounding region. This office has a bench of 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the evidence provided in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oak Park

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 9 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 40% to 86% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. There are 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 9 of them deciding cases here in SSA's latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Paige's 84%. Three of them last decided cases in Michigan. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's Chicago region.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Paige and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions