SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Anthony Capece

Last decided GreenvilleJul 2026
Decisions 1,121since 2023

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. While your judge's overall approval rate since 2023 is 54%, the latest-period approval rate is 58%, which sits 8 percentage points below the Greenville office's latest-period average of 66%. These figures are drawn from a docket of 1,121 decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 54%
Decisions on record 1,121
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Capece Greenville National
Approval rate 58% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 53% — —
Denials 42% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Capece's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Capece
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2023, the approval rate for Anthony Capece has shown a steady pattern across 1,121 decisions on record. After holding at 53% in 2023 and 2024, the rate was 51% in 2025 and 58% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. This recent uptick in the latest period reflects a shift in his decision-making pattern, diverging slightly from the overall average as case mix or evidence quality fluctuates.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Capece's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Greenville hearing office

Anthony Capece's most recent office on record is the Greenville hearing office, which serves you across South Carolina. This office maintains a bench of 13 judges who have recorded decisions there since 2016. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 66%, you can expect a rigorous review of your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Greenville

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 7 of whom decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. These judges have approval rates ranging from 35% to 72% on their records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions