SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Margaret A. Carey

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,370 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent data windows. While Margaret A. Carey maintains a 44% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period performance shows a 48% approval rate, which sits 6 points below the current 54% office-wide average. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 3,370 lifetime decisions, providing a clear view of her historical decision-making patterns.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 3,370
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Carey Chicago National
Approval rate 48% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 25%
Denials 52%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Carey's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Carey
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Margaret A. Carey has shown fluctuations, moving from 40% in 2016 and 34% in 2017 to a peak of 54% in 2020. Following that period, the rate shifted to 44% in 2021, 45% in 2022, 43% in 2023, 51% in 2024, 52% in 2025, and 48% in the latest reporting period. With 3,370 total decisions on record, this trend suggests a judge whose approach adapts to the evidence presented in each case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Carey's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Chicago hearing office

The Chicago hearing office serves you if you are in the Illinois region. It is staffed by a bench of 16 judges on record, maintaining an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 54%. You can see the Chicago Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Chicago hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment is effectively random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 10 of whom reported in the latest SSA period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 41% to 82% over their respective lifetimes.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions