SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Margaret A. Carey

Last decided ChicagoJul 2026
Decisions 3,370since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating an approval rate requires looking at the data in context. Margaret A. Carey has a 44% approval rate across 3,370 decisions on record since 2016, which sits within the 41% to 82% range of the Chicago bench. In the most recent reporting period, her 48% approval rate compares to the 54% office-wide average. These figures provide a statistical baseline for your hearing, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than individual outcomes.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 3,370
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Carey Chicago National
Approval rate 48% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 25% — —
Denials 52% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Carey's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Carey
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your judge's approval rate has fluctuated. After an initial period, the data shows a rise in 2020 followed by a period of relative stability. The most recent data from 2026 shows a 48% approval rate, which is slightly higher than her overall average since 2016. This recent pattern reflects her established decision-making trends.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Carey's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Chicago hearing office

The Chicago hearing office manages a high volume of disability claims. With 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 54%. You can see the Chicago hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Chicago

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Chicago hearing office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 41% to 82%. Preparation remains consistent regardless of your assigned judge.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions