SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Tierney Carlos

Last decided BaltimoreSep 2020
Decisions 1,680since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 55% approval rate for Tierney Carlos reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 32% to 79% range seen among other judges whose most recent office on record is the Baltimore Hearing Office. With 1,680 decisions on record, the data provides a clear view of past trends.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 55%
Decisions on record 1,680

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Carlos. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Carlos's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Carlos
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Tierney Carlos has shown a steady upward trend since 2016. Starting at 43% in 2016, the rate increased to 54% in 2017, 58% in 2018, 59% in 2019, and reached 61% by 2020. This pattern across 1,680 decisions on record since 2016 suggests a consistent evolution in how cases were evaluated over this period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Carlos's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

The Baltimore Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Maryland and the surrounding region. This office features a bench of 24 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process where the quality of your medical documentation remains the primary factor in your decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Baltimore

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 24 judges whose most recent office on record is the Baltimore Hearing Office, with approval rates ranging from 32% to 79% on their since-2016 records. Because you cannot choose your judge, it is important to focus on the strength of your medical evidence.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions