SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Vincent M. Cascio

Office White Plains
On record 3,035 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's record to their peers helps you understand the local environment at the White Plains hearing office. Across the 5 judges on record at this office, lifetime approval rates range from 43% to 82%. Vincent M. Cascio's 56% rate sits within this established range, reflecting the diverse approaches taken by the bench. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 56%
Decisions on record 3,035

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Cascio. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Cascio's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Cascio
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Vincent M. Cascio's approval rate has shown a notable upward trajectory in recent years. While the record began with rates in the low 50% range, the data shows a consistent increase, reaching 65% in 2024 and 70% in 2025. This trend suggests that recent decisions have been more favorable than the historical average. Whether this shift stems from changes in case complexity or evolving evidentiary standards, you should focus on presenting a robust, well-documented case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Cascio's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Vincent M. Cascio is essentially random. There are 5 judges on record at this office since 2016, and approval rates vary significantly across the bench. Because you cannot choose your judge, you should focus on the strength of your own medical evidence. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions