SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Brian W. Lemoine

On record 3,485 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Brian W. Lemoine's approval rates are evaluated against the broader performance of the Hartford bench. In the latest reporting period, his 77% approval rate sits notably higher than the office-wide rate of 59%, the state rate of 54%, and the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical snapshot of his recent activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 74%
Decisions on record 3,485
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Lemoine Hartford National
Approval rate 77% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 76%
Denials 23%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lemoine's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lemoine
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Brian W. Lemoine has presided over 3,485 decisions. His approval trend has remained relatively steady, with yearly rates fluctuating between 59% and 80% over the last decade. The most recent period shows a 77% approval rate, which aligns closely with his long-term performance. This consistency suggests a stable approach to evaluating disability claims, though each case is ultimately decided on its own unique merits and evidentiary record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lemoine's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Hartford hearing office

The Hartford hearing office serves you throughout Connecticut and the surrounding region. With a bench of 9 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 59%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the review of medical and vocational evidence. You can see the Hartford Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges on record at this office since 2016, 6 of whom are reported in the latest SSA period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 27% to 74% lifetime.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions