SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Louis M. Catanese

Last decided NHC AlbuquerqueSep 2021
Decisions 2,133since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The judge's 43% approval rate on record since 2016 is evaluated against the 31% to 61% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the NHC Albuquerque. This data provides a statistical baseline for understanding how different benches approach disability claims. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 43%
Decisions on record 2,133

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Catanese. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Catanese's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Catanese
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Louis M. Catanese has shown a downward trend across the 2,133 decisions on record since 2016. Starting at 50% in 2016, the rate declined to 46% in 2017, 43% in 2018, 41% in 2019, 36% in 2020, and 39% in 2021. This pattern reflects a shift in outcomes over the five-year data window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Catanese's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC Albuquerque hearing office

The NHC Albuquerque hearing office serves you if you are in New Mexico and the surrounding region. This office has a bench of 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary factor in the decision. You can see the NHC Albuquerque Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC Albuquerque

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the NHC Albuquerque, with approval rates ranging from 31% to 61% on their since-2016 records. Because individual judges have different approaches to evaluating evidence, understanding the office-wide bench is helpful.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions