SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sharlee Cendrosky

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2023
Decisions 995 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Sharlee Cendrosky maintains a 52% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period performance shows a 52% approval rate, which sits slightly below the 53% office-wide latest-period average. With 995 decisions on record, the data provides a stable view of her judicial history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 52%
Decisions on record 995
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Cendrosky Akron OH National
Approval rate 52% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 42%
Denials 48%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Cendrosky's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Cendrosky
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY24FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since her record began in 2023, Sharlee Cendrosky has maintained a steady approval trend. Her approval rate was 54% in 2024 and has remained at 52% through 2025 and 2026. This consistency suggests a stable approach to evaluating evidence and medical documentation. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, providing a reliable baseline for your hearing preparation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Cendrosky's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Akron OH hearing office

The Akron OH hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, maintaining a bench of experienced adjudicators. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 53%, reflecting the collective caseload of the local judges. You can expect a formal process focused on the specific medical evidence presented in your file. See the /disability-benefits/hearing-offices/akron-OH Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Akron OH office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment is essentially random. There are 13 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 7 currently reporting in the latest SSA data. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, spanning from 43% to 80% on lifetime records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions