SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Anne W. Chain

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Elkins Park Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 5,667 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Anne W. Chain is measured against the broader performance of the Elkins Park Hearing Office and national standards. With a lifetime record of 5,667 decisions, her data provides a clear look at her historical decision-making patterns. Currently, her approval rate trails the office average of 60% and the national average of 58%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Chain Elkins Park National
Approval rate 48% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 41%
Denials 52%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Chain's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Chain
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 4 years on the bench, Anne W. Chain has seen her approval rate fluctuate, starting at 42% in 2016 and reaching 53% in 2017. Following this, the rate remained steady near 50% to 52% in subsequent years. This trend indicates a consistent approach to case evaluation, even as the volume of decisions has shifted. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern in her judicial history.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Chain's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Chain? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Elkins Park hearing office

The Elkins Park Hearing Office serves a significant population of workers across Pennsylvania, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 60%. You can expect a formal environment where medical documentation and vocational testimony are prioritized. You can see the Elkins Park Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Elkins Park Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 48% to 71%. This variance highlights why focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is critical. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions