SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Luke Woltering

On record 3,749 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. While Luke Woltering maintains a 51% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period performance shows a 50% approval rate, which is 11 percentage points lower than the Elkins Park office average of 61%. These metrics are derived from a record of 3,749 decisions, providing a view of his historical patterns. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 3,749
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Woltering Elkins Park National
Approval rate 50% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 37%
Denials 50%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Woltering's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Woltering
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the record for Luke Woltering shows a varied trend in approval rates. After starting at 62% in 2016, the rate saw a decline toward 41% in 2021 before experiencing a recent stabilization. The latest reporting period shows a 50% approval rate, reflecting a continuation of the patterns observed in recent years. This data, covering 3,749 decisions, helps you understand the historical consistency of the judge's courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Woltering's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Elkins Park hearing office

The Elkins Park hearing office serves claimants throughout the region in Pennsylvania. With a bench of 25 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 61%. You can expect a formal administrative process where evidence quality is the primary driver of the outcome. You can see the Elkins Park Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. The Elkins Park office features 25 judges on record since 2016, with 11 currently reporting in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench range from 33% to 82% lifetime. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions