SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Stuart Gauffreau

Last decided Elkins ParkJul 2026
Decisions 3,766since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Stuart Gauffreau's 75% approval rate compares to the 61% approval rate at the Elkins Park office, the 54% rate in Pennsylvania, and the 58% national average. These figures reflect the decisions made during this 12-month window.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Gauffreau Elkins Park National
Approval rate 75% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 60% — —
Denials 25% — —
Decisions 444 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 3,766

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gauffreau's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Gauffreau
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Stuart Gauffreau has issued 3,766 decisions. His approval rate has trended upward, moving from 39% in 2016 to 74% in 2026. His recent 12-month performance of 75% is higher than his 60% approval rate across the entire period since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gauffreau's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Elkins Park hearing office

The Elkins Park office is the most recent office on record for Stuart Gauffreau, with activity recorded through July 2026. There are 24 judges whose most recent office on record is Elkins Park. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, the office maintained an approval rate of 61%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Elkins Park

The Social Security Administration assigns cases randomly. Among the 10 judges who decided cases at the Elkins Park office in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 50% to 75% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. This range provides a view of the current bench activity at this office.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Gauffreau's 75%. All five last decided cases in Pennsylvania.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Gauffreau and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions