SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Stuart Gauffreau

On record 3,766 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at the same data windows to ensure accuracy. While Gauffreau maintains a 60% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period approval rate of 74% sits 13 points above the Elkins Park office average of 61%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a reliable look at his decision-making history. These rates reflect past trends rather than specific outcomes for your upcoming hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 3,766
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Gauffreau Elkins Park National
Approval rate 74% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 60%
Denials 26%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gauffreau's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Gauffreau
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Gauffreau has presided over 3,766 decisions. His approval rate has shown a consistent upward trend over the last decade, rising from 39% in 2016 to 74% in the most recent reporting period. This steady increase suggests a shift in how cases are evaluated or a change in the types of evidence presented. The latest period reflects a continuation of this upward pattern, moving well beyond his historical lifetime average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gauffreau's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Elkins Park hearing office

The Elkins Park hearing office serves claimants throughout the Pennsylvania region. With 25 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 61%. You can expect a formal environment where the quality of medical documentation and testimony is critical to the outcome of your hearing. You can visit the Elkins Park Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 25 judges on record at this office since 2016, 11 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 33% to 82% on lifetime records. You should prepare for your hearing based on the strength of your own medical evidence regardless of which judge is assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions