SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Clark S. Cheney

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Baltimore Hearing Office · 2 years on the bench · 1,445 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Cheney?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Cheney's approval rate is measured against the broader context of the Baltimore Hearing Office and national standards. While the office maintains a recent approval rate of 66%, Judge Cheney's lifetime performance reflects a distinct pattern based on 1,445 total decisions. These figures provide a statistical baseline for your expectations. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Cheney Baltimore National
Approval rate 31% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 26%
Denials 69%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Cheney's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Cheney
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 2 years on the bench, Judge Cheney has maintained a consistent approach to case evaluation. His approval rate moved from 38% in 2016 to 31% in 2017. This consistency across 1,445 decisions suggests a stable framework for how evidence is weighed in his courtroom. The recent data indicates a continuation of this established pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Cheney's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Cheney? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

The Baltimore Hearing Office serves a large population across Maryland, managing a high volume of SSDI claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently reports an approval rate of 66%, which is higher than both the state and national averages. You should expect a rigorous review process focused on detailed medical documentation. You can see the Baltimore Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Cheney is essentially random. Across the Baltimore bench, lifetime approval rates vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 81%. This diversity highlights why your specific medical evidence remains the most important factor in your claim. You can view the full roster of judges on the Baltimore Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions