SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. J. Samuel Childs

Last decided Atlanta DowntownJul 2026
Decisions 3,187since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates provides context on how a judge's decisions align with broader trends. J. Samuel Childs's 76% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, is measured against the 66% office rate, 57% state rate, and 58% national rate for the same period. These figures are derived from a significant docket size, providing a statistical baseline for the judge's recent activity.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Childs Atlanta Downtown National
Approval rate 76% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 73% — —
Denials 24% — —
Decisions 375 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 70%
Decisions on record 3,187

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Childs's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Childs
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, J. Samuel Childs has issued 3,187 decisions on record, maintaining an overall approval rate of 70%. The yearly trend shows a pattern of approvals that remains consistent with the judge's long-term record. The most recent 12 months sit above the record since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Childs's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta Downtown hearing office

The Atlanta Downtown Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Georgia as part of the regional SSA network. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, with 9 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file through July 2026. The office recorded a 66% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Atlanta Downtown

SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 22 judges whose most recent office on record is Atlanta Downtown, 9 judges decided cases here in SSA's latest file and range from 48% to 81% in approval rates over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. For your preparation, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Childs's 76%. Four of them last decided cases in Georgia. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's Atlanta region.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Childs and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions