SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. S. Charles Murray

On record 3,617 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's record requires looking at both their long-term history and recent performance. S. Charles Murray has maintained a 67% lifetime approval rate, which sits within the broader 23% to 86% range observed across the Atlanta Downtown bench. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's 75% approval rate outperformed the office average of 66% and the national average of 58%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than guaranteed outcomes for your case.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 3,617
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Murray Atlanta Downtown National
Approval rate 75% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 73%
Denials 25%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Murray's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Murray
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, S. Charles Murray has presided over 3,617 decisions. The yearly trend shows a period of relative stability followed by a notable upward shift in approval rates starting in 2024. While the lifetime average is 67%, the most recent data indicates a 75% approval rate. This shift reflects recent patterns in how evidence is evaluated within the judge's docket.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Murray's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta Downtown hearing office

The Atlanta Downtown hearing office serves you throughout Georgia and the surrounding region. With 22 judges on record, the office manages a significant volume of disability claims with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 66%. You can expect a structured environment where evidence presentation is critical to the outcome of your hearing. You can see the /disability-benefits/hearing-offices/atlanta-downtown-GA Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 22 judges on record at this office since 2016, 9 of whom reported data in the latest period. With lifetime approval rates across the bench varying from 23% to 86%, the judge you draw can influence your hearing experience. The office's judges demonstrate a wide variety of approaches to case adjudication.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions