SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. W. Clark

Last decided BaltimoreSep 2017
Decisions 81since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 42% approval rate for W. Clark reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be evaluated against the 32% to 79% range seen among the bench of 24 judges whose most recent office on record is Baltimore. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how cases have been decided in this office.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 81

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Clark. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Clark's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Clark
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The 81 decisions on record for W. Clark since January 2016 show a shift in approval patterns. The approval rate was 59% in 2016 and 26% in 2017. Because each case presents unique medical and vocational factors, these yearly shifts do not necessarily indicate a permanent change in judicial philosophy.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Clark's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

The Baltimore hearing office serves you if you are in Maryland and the surrounding region. There are 24 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, which maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 60%. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical evidence and work history.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Baltimore

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 24 judges whose most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office, and their approval rates on record since 2016 vary from 32% to 79%. This variance is common across the national bench.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions