SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael D. Cofresi

Last decided QueensSep 2016
Decisions 66since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Michael D. Cofresi is based on a total of 66 decisions on record since January 2016. When comparing this to the broader bench at the Queens hearing office, where approval rates for judges range from 49% to 85% over the same period, you can see how this judge's history aligns with local trends. These figures are derived from Social Security Administration data to help you understand the context of your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 66

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Cofresi. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Cofresi's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Cofresi
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The data for Michael D. Cofresi covers a record window from January 2016 through September 2016. During this period, the judge issued 66 decisions with an approval rate of 67%. Because this data window is limited to a single year, the trend appears steady within the available timeframe. This pattern provides a baseline for understanding the judge's historical decision-making, though your case outcome depends on the specific medical evidence and vocational factors you present.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Cofresi's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Queens hearing office

The Queens hearing office, located in New York, serves a significant volume of claimants in the region. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, reflecting a diverse bench with varying approval patterns. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical documentation is paramount.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Queens

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is the Queens hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 49% to 85% on their records since 2016. While these statistics provide context, they do not dictate the outcome of your specific hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions