SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paul Georger

Last decided BuffaloJul 2026
Decisions 3,129since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Paul Georger's 52% approval rate since 2016 sits within the 28% to 89% range observed among the 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Buffalo hearing office. In the most recent reporting period, Paul Georger approved 61% of cases, which is 8 percentage points higher than the office-wide average of 53%. These figures provide statistical context based on 3,129 decisions on record.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 52%
Decisions on record 3,129
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Georger Buffalo National
Approval rate 61% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 54% — —
Denials 39% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Georger's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Georger
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since October 2016, Paul Georger's approval rate has fluctuated, moving from 45% in 2017 to a peak of 63% in 2022 before reaching 61% in the most recent period. With 3,129 total decisions on record, the data shows that approval patterns shift year-to-year, reflecting changes in case complexity or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Georger's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Buffalo hearing office

Paul Georger's most recent office on record is the Buffalo hearing office. This office is home to 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 53%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Buffalo

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Buffalo hearing office, and 5 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 28% to 89% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions