SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Karen A. Cornick-Craig

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Atlanta Downtown Hearing Office · 2 years on the bench · 3,971 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Cornick-Craig?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's history to broader benchmarks provides a clearer picture of the local hearing environment. Karen A. Cornick-Craig maintains a 54% lifetime approval rate, which is evaluated against the latest Atlanta Downtown Hearing Office average of 64% and the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from 3,971 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Cornick-Craig Atlanta Downtown National
Approval rate 54% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 46%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Cornick-Craig's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Cornick-Craig
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 2 years on the bench, Karen A. Cornick-Craig has presided over 3,971 decisions. Her yearly trend shows an approval rate of 52% in 2016 and 59% in 2017. This shift reflects evolving judicial practice during her tenure.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Cornick-Craig's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Cornick-Craig? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta Downtown hearing office

The Atlanta Downtown Hearing Office serves a large population across Georgia, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate that reflects the complex nature of the cases heard in this region. You can expect a formal process focused on medical documentation and vocational testimony.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. Within the Atlanta Downtown Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges vary significantly, ranging from 23% to 69%. This variance highlights why focusing on the strength of your own medical evidence is the most effective strategy.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions