SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Leonard F. Costa

Last decided NewarkJul 2026
Decisions 3,299since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While the office bench shows a wide range of approval rates from 20% to 73% since 2016, Leonard F. Costa maintains a 53% approval rate over the same period. In the most recent reporting period, his 59% approval rate sits 4 percentage points above the Newark office average of 55%. These figures are derived from a volume of 3,299 decisions on record.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 53%
Decisions on record 3,299
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Costa Newark National
Approval rate 59% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 52% — —
Denials 41% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Costa's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Costa
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since October 2016, Leonard F. Costa has issued 3,299 decisions on record. His approval rate has shown a steady trend, moving from 52% in 2017 to 60% in 2025. The most recent fiscal year-to-date data shows a 59% approval rate, which remains consistent with the higher end of his historical performance.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Costa's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Newark hearing office

The Newark hearing office serves claimants throughout the region and maintains a bench of 17 judges. As of the most recent office on record in July 2026, the office-wide approval rate was 55% for the latest reporting period. You can see the Newark Hearing Office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Newark

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge assigned to your hearing is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Newark office, and 10 of them decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench vary significantly, ranging from 20% to 73% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions