SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michelle Crawford

Last decided BaltimoreSep 2020
Decisions 856since 2018

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's history requires looking at the broader context of their hearing office. The bench at the Baltimore office shows a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 32% to 79% for judges with records since 2016. By comparing Michelle Crawford's 64% approval rate against this peer range, you can better understand how her historical decisions align with the office's overall activity. These figures are based on 856 decisions on record since 2018, providing a stable data set.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2018
Approval rate 64%
Decisions on record 856

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Crawford. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Crawford's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Crawford
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Michelle Crawford's approval rate on record since 2018 shows a shift over time. After maintaining approval rates of 70% in 2018 and 69% in 2019, the rate moved to 57% in 2020 across 396 decisions. This trend indicates a change in the approval rate toward the end of her recorded period at the Baltimore office.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Crawford's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

Michelle Crawford's most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office, with decisions there through September 2020. This office serves the Maryland region and maintains a bench of 24 judges who have recorded decisions there since 2016. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical documentation is critical to the outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Baltimore

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Baltimore hearing office, there are 24 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. These judges demonstrate a wide variance in their approval rates, ranging from 32% to 79% on their respective records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions