SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Brian Curley

Last decided Lawrence MASep 2018
Decisions 1,054since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Brian Curley is based on 1,054 decisions on record since 2016. When evaluating this figure, consider the broader bench at the Lawrence MA office, where judges range from 41% to 73% in their since-2016 approval rates. This variation highlights the importance of understanding the specific patterns associated with your assigned judge. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 55%
Decisions on record 1,054

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Curley. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Curley's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Curley
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Brian Curley remained relatively steady throughout the period of 2016 to 2018. After maintaining a 56% approval rate in both 2016 and 2017, the rate was 51% in 2018. With 1,054 total decisions on record, this data provides a consistent view of past activity. This pattern suggests a stable approach to case evaluation over the observed window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Curley's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Lawrence MA hearing office

Brian Curley's most recent office on record is the Lawrence MA hearing office, with decisions there through September 2018. This office serves the region by processing disability claims through a bench of 7 judges. You can expect a formal proceeding where your evidence quality is the primary driver of the outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Lawrence MA

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with approval rates ranging from 41% to 73% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge brings a unique perspective to the hearing room, understanding the local bench is a standard part of your case preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions