SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Adam Dale

Last decided Mt Pleasant MIJul 2026
Decisions 2,839since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Adam Dale are based on 2,839 decisions on record since December 2017. When comparing his latest-period approval rate of 63% to the MT Pleasant MI office average of 65%, you see a difference of 2 percentage points. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how cases have been decided in this office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 59%
Decisions on record 2,839
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Dale Mt Pleasant MI National
Approval rate 63% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 58% — —
Denials 37% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Dale's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Dale
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since December 2017, the approval rate for Adam Dale has varied, moving from 58% in 2018 to 63% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. With 2,839 total decisions on record, the data reflects a consistent volume of activity. The latest-period approval rate of 63% is slightly higher than his overall average on record. This pattern may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality over time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Dale's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Mt Pleasant MI hearing office

The MT Pleasant MI hearing office is the most recent office on record for Adam Dale as of July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 8 judges, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 65%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on medical and vocational evidence. You can see the MT Pleasant MI Hearing Office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Mt Pleasant MI

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 8 judges whose most recent office on record is MT Pleasant MI, and 6 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates among this bench range from 30% to 63% based on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions