SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Diane S. Davis

Last decided Colorado SpringsJul 2026
Decisions 3,179since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates helps you understand how a judge performs relative to their peers. While you have seen an approval rate of 21% across 3,179 decisions since 2016, the latest-period data shows a 14% approval rate, which is 20 percentage points lower than the 34% office-wide average for the same period. These figures provide a statistical baseline, but they do not account for the specific medical evidence in your file.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 21%
Decisions on record 3,179
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Davis Colorado Springs National
Approval rate 14% 34% 58%
Fully favorable 6% — —
Denials 86% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Davis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Davis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your approval rate with Judge Davis has varied. After a period of higher approval, the rate shifted downward and has remained in a lower range in recent years. The latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 14%, with a denial rate of 86%. This recent data reflects a continuation of a pattern where approvals are less frequent than in the earliest years of the record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Davis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Colorado Springs hearing office

The Colorado Springs hearing office is the judge's most recent office on record, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 34%, which provides context for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Colorado Springs

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Colorado Springs hearing office, there are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 21% to 74% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions