SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Craig De Bernardis

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Elkins Park Hearing Office · 1 years on the bench · 985 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge De Bernardis?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to broader benchmarks provides context for your hearing. Judge DE Bernardis maintains a lifetime approval rate of 66%, which trends 8 percentage points above the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from 985 lifetime decisions rendered during his tenure. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge De Bernardis Elkins Park National
Approval rate 66% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 56%
Denials 34%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge De Bernardis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge De Bernardis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 1 year on the bench, Judge DE Bernardis has maintained a consistent approval pattern. With 985 lifetime decisions, the data shows a stable approach to evaluating your disability claim. His latest reporting period indicates he is currently approving cases at a rate that remains 6 percentage points higher than the Elkins Park office average. This steady pattern suggests a predictable approach to evidence review.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge De Bernardis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge DE Bernardis? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Elkins Park hearing office

The Elkins Park hearing office serves you throughout the Pennsylvania region. This office manages a high volume of cases with a bench of 6 judges, maintaining an office-wide latest approval rate of 60%. You should expect a standard administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. See the Elkins Park Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. Within the Elkins Park hearing office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 50% to 71%. This variance highlights why understanding the specific tendencies of your assigned judge is a vital part of your hearing strategy. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions