Manuel del Valle is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the San Juan office. Over 4 years on the bench and 8,011 lifetime decisions, you will find an 87% approval rate, which is 29 percentage points above the national average of 58%. Because case assignment is random, understanding your judge's history is vital. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rate for Judge del Valle stands at 87% over his 4-year tenure, based on 8,011 lifetime decisions. Compared to the latest reporting period, his performance is higher than the San Juan Hearing Office average of 68% and the national average of 58%. These statistics provide a look at historical trends, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Valle's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over his 4 years on the bench, Judge del Valle has maintained a consistent pattern of high approval rates. His annual approval rates were 94% in 2016, 88% in 2017, 86% in 2018, and 80% in 2019. This trend indicates a steady approach to case evaluation, suggesting that he maintains a consistent threshold for evidence across his docket.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Valle's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge del Valle? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the San Juan hearing office
The San Juan Hearing Office serves the population of Puerto Rico, managing a high volume of disability claims. With 6 judges on the bench, the office handles a diverse range of medical and vocational evidence. The office-wide latest approval rate is 68%, which provides a baseline for the region.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Within the San Juan Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 43% to 87%. Because each judge has a unique approach to testimony and medical evidence, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful for your preparation.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
