SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael W. Devlin

Last decided RochesterJul 2026
Decisions 3,692since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. While the judge's overall approval rate since 2016 is 74%, recent data shows a 78% approval rate during the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 10 percentage points above the Rochester office average of 68%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable look at historical trends.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 74%
Decisions on record 3,692
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Devlin Rochester National
Approval rate 78% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 68% — —
Denials 22% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Devlin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Devlin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Michael W. Devlin has shown a generally steady trend. After a dip in 2020, the approval rate has trended upward, reaching 78% in the most recent reporting period. This recent performance reflects a continuation of the steady pattern observed in the years leading up to 2026. The latest period, which includes 405 decisions, demonstrates that recent decision-making remains consistent with this upward trajectory.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Devlin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Rochester hearing office

Michael W. Devlin's most recent office on record is the Rochester hearing office, as of July 2026. This office serves claimants across the New York region and maintains a bench of 4 judges. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 68%, providing a benchmark for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Rochester

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Rochester hearing office, there are 4 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 2 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this bench range from 65% to 77% based on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions