SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Brian Kane

Last decided RochesterJul 2026
Decisions 3,579since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's history requires looking at the data in context. Brian Kane's 71% approval rate since 2016 sits within the 65% to 77% range observed among the bench at the Rochester hearing office. While latest-period data shows a 62% approval rate compared to the office's 68%, these figures represent a snapshot in time rather than a long-term trend.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 71%
Decisions on record 3,579
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kane Rochester National
Approval rate 62% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 57% — —
Denials 38% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kane's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kane
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Brian Kane has issued 3,579 decisions. The approval trend remained relatively steady for several years, though the most recent data shows a decline from the historical average. This shift in the latest period may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality. The pattern provides a view of how Brian Kane has approached cases over the last decade, though each hearing remains unique.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kane's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Rochester hearing office

Brian Kane's most recent office on record is the Rochester hearing office, which serves claimants across the region. This office maintains a bench of 4 judges with varying approval patterns. You can expect a standard hearing process where your evidence quality is the primary factor in your decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Rochester

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 4 judges whose most recent office on record is the Rochester hearing office, with 2 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates across this bench range from 65% to 77% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions