SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Patrick R. Digby

Last decided FlorenceJul 2026
Decisions 3,312since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. The 32% approval rate for Patrick R. Digby covers all decisions on record since 2016, placing him within the 32% to 76% range seen among his peers at the Florence hearing office. In the most recent reporting period, his 37% approval rate sits 10 points below the office average of 47%. These figures are based on a docket of 3,312 decisions on record since 2016.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 32%
Decisions on record 3,312
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Digby Florence National
Approval rate 37% 47% 58%
Fully favorable 30% — —
Denials 63% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Digby's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Digby
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Patrick R. Digby has shown significant variation since 2016. After a period of decline that saw rates reach a low of 15% in 2021, the trend has shifted upward, with recent years showing more consistent approval levels. The 37% approval rate in the latest period reflects a continuation of this recent pattern of stabilization compared to earlier, lower figures.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Digby's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Florence hearing office

Patrick R. Digby's most recent office on record is the Florence hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 9 judges who handle a high volume of disability claims. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 47%, you can expect a rigorous review of your medical evidence and work history.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Florence

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Florence hearing office, 6 of whom decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this bench vary widely, ranging from 32% to 76% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions