SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Patrick R. Digby

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,312 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent timeframes. Patrick R. Digby's lifetime approval rate of 32% falls within the 32% to 76% range observed among all judges at the Florence office since 2016. In the most recent reporting period, his 37% approval rate is 10 percentage points lower than the office average of 47%. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 3,312 lifetime decisions.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 32%
Decisions on record 3,312
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Digby Florence National
Approval rate 37% 47% 58%
Fully favorable 30%
Denials 63%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Digby's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Digby
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Patrick R. Digby shows a varied trend since 2016. After reaching a low point in 2021, the approval rate has seen a gradual recovery. The latest-period approval rate of 37% reflects this recent shift compared to the lower rates seen in the middle of the data window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Digby's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Florence hearing office

The Florence hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a key venue for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) hearings in Alabama. The office maintains a bench of 9 judges who manage a high volume of cases. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 47%, the office focuses on the specific medical and vocational evidence you present in your claim.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. The Florence office bench includes 9 judges on record since 2016, 6 of whom are reported in the latest SSA data. Approval rates across this office vary significantly, ranging from 32% to 76% on a lifetime basis.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions