SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lori J. Williams

Last decided FlorenceJul 2026
Decisions 3,453since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. The data below contrasts the 52% approval rate on record since 2016 against the broader range of 32% to 76% seen among the bench at the Florence office. We also examine the latest reporting period to see how current trends compare to national and state averages. These figures are derived from thousands of decisions, providing a stable statistical foundation for your research.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 52%
Decisions on record 3,453
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Williams Florence National
Approval rate 55% 47% 58%
Fully favorable 42% — —
Denials 45% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Williams's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Williams
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Lori J. Williams has fluctuated over the last decade. Since the record began in 2016, the judge has issued 3,453 decisions, with yearly approval rates ranging from 46% to 58%. The most recent data from 2026 shows a 55% approval rate. This latest period reflects a continuation of the judge's established decision-making pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Williams's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Florence hearing office

The most recent office on record for Lori J. Williams is the Florence hearing office, which serves claimants across Alabama. This office maintains a bench of 9 judges who handle a high volume of disability claims. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 47%, providing a local benchmark for your comparison.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Florence

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Florence hearing office, 6 of whom decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 32% to 76% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions