SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. James K. Grimes

Last decided FlorenceJul 2026
Decisions 3,249since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same period. The 47% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a broad view of history, while latest-period figures allow for a current comparison against the Florence office, state, and national averages. With 3,249 decisions on record, the data offers a look at past outcomes. These figures reflect historical trends rather than specific predictions for your upcoming hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 3,249
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Grimes Florence National
Approval rate 45% 47% 58%
Fully favorable 39% — —
Denials 55% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Grimes's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Grimes
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since October 2016, your approval rate for James K. Grimes has fluctuated. After starting at 62% in 2017, the rate trended downward before seeing a recovery in 2022 and 2023. The most recent data from 2026 shows a 45% approval rate. This latest period reflects a continuation of the variance observed in recent years, which may be influenced by changes in case complexity or the specific evidence presented in your hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Grimes's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Florence hearing office

The most recent office on record for James K. Grimes is the Florence hearing office, which serves claimants in Alabama. With 9 judges on the bench, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 47%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can visit the Florence hearing office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Florence

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Florence hearing office, there are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 6 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this bench range from 32% to 76% on their since-2016 records. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions