SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Clint Dorman

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,635 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure an accurate picture. Clint Dorman holds a 73% lifetime approval rate, which sits within the 50% to 89% range observed across the Greensboro bench. In the most recent reporting period, his 73% approval rate outperformed the office and state averages of 65% and the national average of 58%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than specific predictions for your hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 73%
Decisions on record 3,635
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Dorman Greensboro National
Approval rate 73% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 62%
Denials 27%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Dorman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Dorman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Clint Dorman has issued 3,635 decisions. His approval rate has remained relatively steady over the years, showing minor fluctuations rather than sharp shifts. While his annual approval rate has moved between 63% and 77% throughout this period, the most recent data shows a return to his long-term average of 73%. This consistency suggests a stable approach to evaluating evidence and medical documentation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Dorman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Greensboro hearing office

The Greensboro hearing office serves you throughout North Carolina and the surrounding region. With 16 judges on record, the office maintains an active docket to manage local disability claims. The office-wide latest approval rate is 65%, providing a baseline for the region. You can see the Greensboro Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 8 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. Because approval rates vary significantly across the bench, ranging from 50% to 89%, understanding the office environment is helpful. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions