SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Benjamin R. McMillion

Last decided GreensboroJul 2026
Decisions 3,774since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Benjamin R. McMillion are presented alongside the broader performance of the Greensboro hearing office, North Carolina, and national averages over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. These figures are derived from 376 decisions handled by the judge during this period. Comparing these metrics provides context for how the judge's recent activity aligns with regional and national trends.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge McMillion Greensboro National
Approval rate 56% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 51% — —
Denials 44% — —
Decisions 376 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 70%
Decisions on record 3,774

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McMillion's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McMillion
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Benjamin R. McMillion has issued 3,774 decisions. The yearly approval trend shows fluctuation, moving from 57% in 2016 to a peak of 95% in 2023 before shifting to 56% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. This recent rate sits below the 70% approval rate recorded since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McMillion's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Greensboro hearing office

The Greensboro hearing office is the most recent office on record for Benjamin R. McMillion, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. The office maintained a 65% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the review of your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Greensboro

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge assigned to your hearing is essentially random. Approval rates vary across the bench, with the 8 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file ranging from 51% to 84% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge McMillion's 56%. All five last decided cases in North Carolina.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge McMillion and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions