SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Benjamin R. McMillion

On record 3,774 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The Greensboro hearing office bench maintains a lifetime approval-rate range between 50% and 89%. Benjamin R. McMillion's lifetime record of 70% sits within this spectrum, though his latest-period approval rate of 54% currently tracks 11 percentage points below the office-wide latest-period average of 65%. These figures are based on a docket of 3,774 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 70%
Decisions on record 3,774
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge McMillion Greensboro National
Approval rate 54% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 50%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McMillion's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McMillion
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Benjamin R. McMillion's approval rate has followed a notable arc. After peaking at 95% in 2023, the rate has seen a decline in the most recent reporting periods, settling at 54% in 2026. This shift highlights the importance of current evidence preparation, as the latest period reflects a departure from the higher approval levels seen in previous years. These fluctuations are common and often depend on the specific mix of cases and medical evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McMillion's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Greensboro hearing office

The Greensboro hearing office serves you throughout North Carolina and the surrounding region. With a bench of 16 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 65%. You can expect a formal process focused on the documentation of your medical impairments and work history. You can see the Greensboro Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Greensboro office currently features 16 judges on record since 2016, with 8 judges reporting in the latest SSA data period. Because the SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, you cannot choose your judge, and the assignment is effectively random. The office-wide lifetime approval rates for this bench range from 50% to 89%. For your preparation, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions