SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Carol A. Eckersen

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Sacramento Hearing Office · 9 years on the bench · 17,671 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Eckersen?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Carol A. Eckersen maintains a lifetime approval rate of 59%, which matches the 59% state average and sits 1 point above the national average of 58%. While the Sacramento Hearing Office currently reports a latest approval rate of 65%, these figures are based on a large volume of cases handled over her 9 years on the bench. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Eckersen Sacramento National
Approval rate 59% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 50%
Denials 41%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Eckersen's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Eckersen
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY24
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her tenure, your judge has shown an upward trend in approval rates. Starting at 48% in 2016, her annual approval rate reached 70% in 2023 and 68% in 2024. These patterns reflect the evolving nature of case evidence and legal standards, providing a baseline for what to expect during your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Eckersen's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Eckersen? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Sacramento hearing office

The Sacramento Hearing Office serves a diverse population across California, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an active docket that requires consistent adherence to 20 CFR Part 404 regulations. You can expect a professional environment focused on the thorough review of your medical records and vocational testimony.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning you cannot request a specific judge. At the Sacramento Hearing Office, the bench of 6 judges ranges from 57% to 75% in lifetime approval rates. Because your assignment is random, your focus should remain on the strength of your medical evidence.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions