Donna M. Edwards's most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office, with decisions there through September 2023. Across the 2,381 decisions on record since 2016, 62% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 32% to 79% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your specific case.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rate for Donna M. Edwards is based on 2,381 decisions rendered since 2016. This figure sits within the broader range of 32% to 79% observed among the 24 judges whose most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office. By comparing these metrics, you can better understand the variance in outcomes across the local bench.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Edwards. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2023. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Edwards's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval trend for Donna M. Edwards has shown fluctuations since 2016. After starting at 59% in 2016, the rate reached a peak of 70% in 2022 before a decline in the limited 2023 data. These 2,381 decisions on record reveal a judge whose approval patterns have shifted over time, likely influenced by changes in case complexity or evidentiary standards.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Edwards's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Baltimore hearing office
Donna M. Edwards's most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office, which serves you across Maryland. This office is part of a regional network that handles a high volume of disability claims, with a bench of 24 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a formal process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Baltimore
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 24 judges whose most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 32% to 79% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge maintains their own approach to evaluating evidence, the specific judge you draw matters.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Donna M. Edwards has a 62% approval rate since 2016. This falls within the 32% to 79% range observed among the 24 judges whose most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this judge's bench.
Yes, the approval rate has varied over the years, ranging from 55% in 2018 to 70% in 2022. With 2,381 decisions on record since 2016, these shifts reflect the evolving nature of the cases heard. An attorney can help you understand how these patterns might impact your specific claim.
No, you cannot choose your judge. The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, making the assignment process random. Because you cannot control the assignment, an attorney can help you prepare a strong case regardless of which judge is selected.
An SSDI hearing is a formal proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and hears testimony. You may be questioned about your work history, daily limitations, and medical treatments. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony and ensure your evidence is organized for the hearing.
The 62% approval rate for Donna M. Edwards is a historical statistic, not a guarantee of your outcome. Your success depends primarily on the quality of your medical evidence and your ability to prove your disability under SSA rules. An attorney can help you evaluate your case strengths and prepare accordingly.




