SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Donna M. Edwards

Last decided BaltimoreSep 2023
Decisions 2,381since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Donna M. Edwards is based on 2,381 decisions rendered since 2016. This figure sits within the broader range of 32% to 79% observed among the 24 judges whose most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office. By comparing these metrics, you can better understand the variance in outcomes across the local bench.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 2,381

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Edwards. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2023. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Edwards's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Edwards
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Donna M. Edwards has shown fluctuations since 2016. After starting at 59% in 2016, the rate reached a peak of 70% in 2022 before a decline in the limited 2023 data. These 2,381 decisions on record reveal a judge whose approval patterns have shifted over time, likely influenced by changes in case complexity or evidentiary standards.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Edwards's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

Donna M. Edwards's most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office, which serves you across Maryland. This office is part of a regional network that handles a high volume of disability claims, with a bench of 24 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a formal process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Baltimore

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 24 judges whose most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 32% to 79% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge maintains their own approach to evaluating evidence, the specific judge you draw matters.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions