SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Steven J. Ehlenbeck

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Atlanta North Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 7,091 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Ehlenbeck?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Ehlenbeck's lifetime approval rate of 45% is currently 4 percentage points below the Atlanta North office average and 13 points below both the state and national averages. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 7,091 lifetime decisions, offering a clear view of his historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Ehlenbeck Atlanta North National
Approval rate 45% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 38%
Denials 55%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ehlenbeck's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ehlenbeck
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 4 years on the bench, Judge Ehlenbeck's approval rate has shown notable variation. After an initial 45% approval rate in 2016, the rate rose to 54% in 2017 before trending downward to 37% in 2019. This fluctuation across 7,091 lifetime decisions suggests that case outcomes may be sensitive to shifts in evidentiary quality or case complexity. The recent trend reflects a departure from his earlier, higher approval periods.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ehlenbeck's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Ehlenbeck? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta North hearing office

The Atlanta North Hearing Office serves a large population of applicants across Georgia, managing a high volume of disability cases. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 49%. You can visit the Atlanta North Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. Within the Atlanta North office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 22% to 62%. This diversity highlights why focusing on the strength of your own medical evidence is the most effective strategy. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions