SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Thomas L. English

Last decided LansingSep 2016
Decisions 98since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates provides context for how different judges evaluate evidence, though every case is unique. The 52% approval rate for Thomas L. English sits within the 37% to 68% range observed among the 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Lansing hearing office. These figures are based on the total decisions on record since 2016, providing a view of past activity.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 52%
Decisions on record 98

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge English. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge English's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge English
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Thomas L. English includes 98 decisions spanning from January 2016 to September 2016. During this period, the approval rate was 52%. This data reflects a consistent approach to case evaluation during that time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge English's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Lansing hearing office

The Lansing hearing office serves claimants across Michigan. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard hearing process where the focus is on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Lansing

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Lansing hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 37% to 68% since 2016. While these rates vary, the fundamental requirements for proving disability remain the same.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions