SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert M. Erickson

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,488 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Evaluating your chances requires looking at the broader context of the San Francisco hearing office. While the office-wide lifetime approval-rate range spans from 28% to 65%, Robert M. Erickson sits at the top of this range with a 65% approval rate. These figures are derived from 2,488 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 65%
Decisions on record 2,488

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Erickson. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2023. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Erickson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Erickson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Robert M. Erickson spans from 2016 to 2023, showing a consistent pattern of decision-making. His yearly approval rates have fluctuated, reaching a high of 72% in 2020 and settling at 61% in 2023. This trend suggests a judge who maintains a steady approach to evaluating your disability claims over time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Erickson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Francisco hearing office

The San Francisco hearing office serves you throughout the region, acting as a hub for disability adjudication in California. The office maintains a bench of 10 judges on record, each contributing to the local caseload. You can expect a formal hearing process where your evidence quality is the primary driver of the outcome.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 10 judges on record at this office since 2016, 5 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 28% to 65% on a lifetime basis.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions