SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gloria Pellegrino

Last decided San FranciscoJul 2026
Decisions 2,614since 2018

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Gloria Pellegrino are based on 2,614 decisions on record since January 2018. When comparing these figures to the broader bench at the San Francisco hearing office, where judges range from 28% to 65% in approval rates, the data provides a statistical baseline. In the latest reporting period, Gloria Pellegrino recorded a 59% approval rate, compared to a 46% rate for the office overall.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2018
Approval rate 56%
Decisions on record 2,614
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Pellegrino San Francisco National
Approval rate 59% 46% 58%
Fully favorable 42% — —
Denials 41% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pellegrino's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pellegrino
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2018, Gloria Pellegrino has presided over 2,614 decisions. Her approval rate has fluctuated, showing an upward trend from 2019 through 2023 before stabilizing. The latest reporting period shows a 59% approval rate, which is consistent with her performance in 2025. This pattern reflects her established decision-making tendencies over the last several years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pellegrino's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Francisco hearing office

The San Francisco hearing office is the most recent office on record for Gloria Pellegrino as of July 2026. This office hosts a bench of 10 judges who manage a diverse caseload of disability claims. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 46%, you can expect a review of your medical evidence and vocational history.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Francisco

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is assigned randomly. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Francisco hearing office. These judges show an approval-rate range of 28% to 65% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions