SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Joseph R. Faraguna

On record 1,882 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's history requires looking at the full scope of their record. Joseph R. Faraguna has issued 1,882 decisions, providing a substantial data set to observe his decision-making patterns. This lifetime rate of 81% is compared against the broader performance of the Long Island bench, where lifetime approval rates range from 48% to 83%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 81%
Decisions on record 1,882

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Faraguna. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Faraguna's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Faraguna
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Joseph R. Faraguna spans from 2016 to 2020, showing a generally steady approval trend throughout his time on the bench. While the approval rate remained consistent near 80% for the first four years of the data window, the final period saw a shift to 72% over a smaller volume of cases. This variation is common in judicial dockets and may reflect changes in the specific types of cases or the quality of evidence presented. The data provides a clear look at his historical approach to disability claims.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Faraguna's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Long Island hearing office

The Long Island hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a critical hub for disability adjudications in New York. The office bench consists of 12 judges on record, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 71%. You can expect a formal hearing process where the focus remains on the medical and vocational evidence supporting your claim. You can see the Long Island Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. There are 12 judges on record at the Long Island office since 2016, 7 of whom are reported in the latest SSA period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 48% to 83% over their respective lifetime records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions