SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. John G. Farrell

Last decided AlbanyJul 2026
Decisions 3,156since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When reviewing the data for John G. Farrell, it is helpful to compare the judge's performance against the broader bench at the Albany hearing office. While you see a 73% approval rate across 3,156 decisions since 2016, the office bench shows a range of 40% to 81% for the same period. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's 80% approval rate sits 19 points above the office average of 61%.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 73%
Decisions on record 3,156
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Farrell Albany National
Approval rate 80% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 74% — —
Denials 20% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Farrell's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Farrell
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for John G. Farrell has shown an upward trend since 2016. After starting at 62% in 2016, the rate climbed, reaching 85% in both 2022 and 2023. While the 2026 fiscal year-to-date rate of 80% shows a slight shift, it remains above the initial levels observed at the start of the record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Farrell's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Albany hearing office

John G. Farrell's most recent office on record is the Albany hearing office. This office is staffed by 15 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 61%, you should focus on ensuring your medical evidence is comprehensive and clearly linked to your functional limitations.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Albany

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Albany hearing office, 8 of whom decided cases in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates among this bench vary significantly, ranging from 40% to 81% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions