SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Leah Farrell

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Newark Hearing Office · 2 years on the bench · 1,573 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Farrell?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

When evaluating your potential outcome, comparing a judge's lifetime performance against broader office and national benchmarks provides helpful context. Judge Farrell maintains a 55% approval rate, while the Newark Hearing Office currently averages 57% and the national average stands at 58%. These figures are derived from 1,573 lifetime decisions, offering a stable statistical baseline for your review.

Metric Judge Farrell Newark National
Approval rate 55% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 47%
Denials 45%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Farrell's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Farrell
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a two-year tenure, Judge Farrell's decision-making has shown a notable shift in approval trends. While the 2016 period saw an approval rate of 49%, the 2017 period rose to 68%. This upward trajectory suggests that the judge's approach to case evidence has evolved since starting on the bench. Such fluctuations are common and often reflect changes in the complexity of the cases assigned or the quality of evidence presented during the hearing process.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Farrell's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Farrell? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Newark hearing office

The Newark Hearing Office serves a significant volume of claimants across New Jersey, operating with a bench of 6 judges. The office maintains a latest approval rate of 57%, reflecting the regional standards for disability adjudication. You should expect a formal process focused on the specific medical documentation supporting your claim. You can visit the Newark Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Newark Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 ALJs range from 40% to 65%. Because you cannot choose your judge, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence remains the most effective way to prepare.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions