SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Leah Farrell

Last decided NewarkSep 2017
Decisions 260since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same period to ensure accuracy. The 57% approval rate for Leah Farrell reflects her total decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 20% to 73% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Newark. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how different judges have historically approached their dockets.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 260

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Farrell. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Farrell's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Farrell
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Leah Farrell shows a shift across the 260 decisions on record since 2016. In 2016, your approval rate was 49% over 246 decisions, followed by 75% over 107 decisions in 2017. This trend indicates a change in the proportion of favorable outcomes during the period covered by the data.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Farrell's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Newark hearing office

The Newark hearing office serves you and other claimants across New Jersey. With 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office handles a diverse range of disability claims. You can expect a formal hearing process where your medical documentation is the primary factor in the decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Newark

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is Newark, with approval rates ranging from 20% to 73% on their since-2016 records. Because you cannot choose your judge, focus on the strength of your own medical evidence.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions