SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Ramona L. Fernandez

Last decided Livonia MISep 2025
Decisions 3,248since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing performance requires looking at consistent data windows. Fernandez's 68% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 44% to 74% range observed among the 18 judges whose most recent office on record is Livonia MI. Because these figures are based on thousands of decisions, they provide a stable view of past trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 68%
Decisions on record 3,248

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Fernandez. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Fernandez's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Fernandez
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your judge's approval rate has shown notable fluctuations. After a period of relative stability between 2016 and 2018, the rate increased in 2019 before trending downward in 2021. Recent years, specifically 2023 and 2024, showed a return to higher approval levels, though the partial 2025 data reflects a significant shift. This pattern highlights how your case mix and evolving evidentiary standards can influence outcomes over time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Fernandez's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Livonia MI hearing office

The Livonia MI hearing office serves claimants across Michigan and is part of the broader SSA regional network. With 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office manages a diverse caseload of disability claims. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in any decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Livonia MI

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Livonia MI office, there are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, with approval rates ranging from 44% to 74% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions