SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Anthony R. Smereka

Last decided Livonia MIJul 2026
Decisions 4,536since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Anthony R. Smereka has a 54% approval rate since 2016, his latest-period approval rate is 56%. This sits 2 percentage points below the Livonia MI office latest-period average of 58%. With 4,536 decisions on record, the data provides a view of his decision-making history. These figures reflect past outcomes rather than a guarantee for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 54%
Decisions on record 4,536
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Smereka Livonia MI National
Approval rate 56% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 46% — —
Denials 44% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Smereka's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Smereka
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Anthony R. Smereka has issued 4,536 decisions. His yearly approval trend has fluctuated, showing a low of 42% in 2018 and a high of 61% in 2024. The latest period shows a 56% approval rate, which is consistent with his overall average on record. This pattern suggests that while individual years vary, his approach remains grounded in the evidence presented in each case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Smereka's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Livonia MI hearing office

The Livonia MI hearing office serves you and other claimants across the region. With 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 58%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Livonia MI

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Livonia MI office. Approval rates for this bench range from 44% to 74% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions