SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Victoria A. Ferrer

Last decided Orland ParkSep 2024
Decisions 2,667since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The most relevant comparison for your hearing is the performance of the bench at the Orland Park office. Judges at this location show a wide range of approval outcomes, from 25% to 69% since 2016. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 50%
Decisions on record 2,667

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Ferrer. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2024. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ferrer's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ferrer
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY24
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Victoria A. Ferrer has shown a varied trend across 2,667 total decisions on record. After an initial period of fluctuation, the rate moved through several cycles, including a 45% approval rate in 2023 followed by a 55% rate in 2024. This pattern suggests that your decision outcome depends on the specific evidence presented in your case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ferrer's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orland Park hearing office

Victoria A. Ferrer's most recent office on record is the Orland Park hearing office, which serves the Illinois region. This office is part of a broader network of hearing locations where 9 judges have their most recent record. You can expect a formal process focused on the medical and vocational evidence of your disability. You can see the Orland Park Hearing Office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Orland Park

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assigned judge is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Orland Park office. Because approval rates across this bench vary from 25% to 69%, your assigned judge is a factor in the hearing process. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions