SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kim K. Griswold

Last decided Springfield MAJul 2026
Decisions 3,375since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing performance requires looking at consistent timeframes. The 42% approval rate for Kim K. Griswold reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which we compare against the 42% to 77% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Springfield MA hearing office. In the latest reporting period, Kim K. Griswold's 56% approval rate sits 5 points below the office average of 61%. These figures provide context based on 3,375 decisions on record.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 3,375
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Griswold Springfield MA National
Approval rate 56% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 44% — —
Denials 44% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Griswold's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Griswold
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Kim K. Griswold has shown an upward trend. After hovering between 34% and 42% for several years, the rate began to climb in 2023, reaching 56% in the most recent partial fiscal year. This shift suggests that the latest period reflects a departure from the earlier, more conservative approval patterns observed on the record. These changes in approval frequency may reflect shifts in the complexity of cases or the quality of evidence presented in recent hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Griswold's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Springfield MA hearing office

Kim K. Griswold's most recent office on record is the Springfield MA hearing office, which serves claimants across western Massachusetts. This office is home to 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, and it maintains an office-wide approval rate of 61% in the latest reporting period. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Springfield MA

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is effectively random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Springfield MA hearing office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 42% to 77% since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions