SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kim K. Griswold

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,375 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Kim K. Griswold maintains a 42% lifetime approval rate, recent data shows a 56% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest figure sits 5 points below the Springfield MA office average of 61%. With over 3,000 decisions on record, the data provides a stable view of the judge's history. These figures reflect a shift in recent decision-making patterns.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 3,375
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Griswold Springfield MA National
Approval rate 56% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 44%
Denials 44%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Griswold's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Griswold
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Kim K. Griswold has shown a steady upward trajectory in recent years. After a period of lower approval rates between 2018 and 2021, the numbers have consistently climbed, reaching 56% in the most recent reporting period. This shift suggests that the judge's recent decision-making reflects a different pattern than the earlier years of the record. This recent uptick may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Griswold's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Springfield MA hearing office

The Springfield MA hearing office serves you throughout the region. With 9 judges on record, the office maintains an active docket and a wide range of judicial approaches. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 61%, providing a benchmark for the local environment. You can see the Springfield MA Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Springfield MA hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment is essentially random. There are 9 judges on record at this office since 2016, 5 of whom are reported in the latest SSA data. The lifetime approval rates across this bench range from 42% to 77%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions