SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Scott C. Firestone

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,082 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Scott C. Firestone reflect a significant volume of cases, providing a baseline for understanding his judicial record. While his lifetime rate stands at 59%, his latest-period approval rate of 50% sits 15 percentage points below the Greensboro office average of 65%. These comparisons are based on the latest reporting period to ensure statistical accuracy. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 59%
Decisions on record 2,082
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Firestone Greensboro National
Approval rate 50% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 46%
Denials 50%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Firestone's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Firestone
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the decision pattern for Scott C. Firestone has shown notable fluctuations. After reaching a peak approval rate of 72% in 2017, the trend has shifted, with the most recent data showing a 50% approval rate in 2026. This trajectory reflects a move toward more conservative outcomes in recent years compared to his earlier record. Understanding these shifts is essential for preparing your evidence effectively, as the latest period reflects a departure from his historical average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Firestone's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Greensboro hearing office

The Greensboro hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a critical hub for North Carolina disability cases. With a bench of 16 judges on record and a latest-period office-wide approval rate of 65%, this office manages a high volume of complex claims. You can expect a rigorous review process that prioritizes your medical documentation and vocational evidence. See the Greensboro Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Greensboro hearing office currently hosts 16 judges on record, with 8 judges actively reporting in the latest SSA data. Because the Social Security Administration uses a random workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, you cannot request a specific judge for your hearing. Approval rates across this bench vary widely, ranging from 50% to 89% over their respective lifetimes. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions