SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Loranzo Fleming

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 596 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Loranzo Fleming maintains a 38% lifetime approval rate across 596 decisions, which sits within the broader 24% to 94% range observed among the 24 judges on record at the Atlanta North office. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how cases are processed in this jurisdiction. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 38%
Decisions on record 596

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Fleming. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Fleming's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Fleming
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Loranzo Fleming spans from 2016 to 2019. His approval rate showed an upward trend, moving from 31% in 2017 to 47% by 2019. This shift suggests that his approach to evidence or case mix evolved during his time on the bench. Understanding this progression helps you frame your medical evidence to align with the standards applied in this courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Fleming's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta North hearing office

The Atlanta North hearing office serves you throughout Georgia, operating as a hub for disability adjudication. The office maintains a bench of 24 judges on record, reflecting a wide spectrum of decision-making styles. You can expect a formal proceeding where the quality of your medical documentation is the primary factor in the outcome. You can see the Atlanta North Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 24 judges on record at this office since 2016, with lifetime approval rates ranging from 24% to 94%. Because of this variance, knowing the general landscape of the Atlanta North bench is useful. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions